By the end of this chapter, you will be able to:
These skills are essential because they help you support clients effectively and make a real difference in social work practice.
Compiled by: Samuel Wanjohi
Conducting a thorough problem analysis is a foundational step in social work advocacy and lobbying, critical for identifying the root causes of social issues and formulating effective interventions. In Kenya, social workers often engage with complex challenges such as poverty, gender-based violence, and access to healthcare, which require a precise understanding before advocating for change. This chapter explores the meaning and importance of problem advocacy analysis, equipping social workers with the skills to dissect problems systematically and advocate successfully for vulnerable populations.
Advocacy is at the centre of social work. Social workers meet clients whose problems come from unfair rules, lack of services or lack of a voice, and who cannot solve them by themselves. Advocacy is the way a social worker takes up such matters with the people and institutions that can change them. This topic explains what advocacy means, its main forms and why it matters in social work practice.
Advocacy is the act of speaking, writing or acting on behalf of a person, group or cause, or together with them, to defend their rights, secure services and influence decisions that affect them. It is directed at people who hold power, such as officers, committees, employers, leaders and lawmakers, and it aims to bring about change in a policy, a practice, a service or an attitude. Advocacy is not charity and it does not take decisions for clients. It supports them to be heard and to take part, and a good advocate leaves the person or community stronger and more able to speak for themselves.
Advocacy has to be carried out responsibly. The social worker respects the client's right to decide, tells the truth and uses accurate evidence, keeps private information confidential unless the client agrees to share it, involves the people affected at every stage, and uses peaceful and lawful means. The worker also checks that the action does not put the client at risk, for example of being harassed or losing a service.
Create a free account to open more of this chapter.
Free: practical guides, quick cards, workplace scenarios and more.
Create a free accountThis chapter explored the meaning and importance of problem advocacy analysis, emphasizing its role in effectively addressing social challenges. It examined key theories that underpin the advocacy process, providing a foundation for strategic action. Lobbying was defined and its significance highlighted as a complementary approach to advocacy in influencing decision-makers. Various types of social issues were discussed to illustrate the diverse contexts where advocacy applies. The chapter underscored the value of engaging community leaders to enhance legitimacy and reach. It detailed the steps involved in identifying the target group to ensure focused interventions. The development of advocacy assessment tools was presented as essential for measuring impact and guiding efforts. Finally, the chapter addressed the roles of different stakeholders in advocacy and lobbying, and concluded with guidance on report writing to document and communicate findings effectively.
Type: Individual
| Tools & Equipment | Materials |
|---|---|
| Pens | A4 Papers |
| Markers | Flip Chart Paper |
| Laptop or Tablet |
| S/N | Item | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | A4 Papers | 10 Sheets per Candidate |
| 2 | Pens (Blue or Black) | 2 Pcs per Candidate |
| 3 | Flip Chart Paper | 1 Sheet per Candidate |
| 4 | Markers (Black, Red, Blue) | 3 Pcs per Candidate |
| 5 | Laptop or Tablet | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 6 | Internet Access | 1 Connection per Candidate |
| Items to be Evaluated | Marks Available | Marks Obtained | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| TASK 1: Conduct Problem Advocacy Analysis | |||
| Selected a relevant and clear title for the advocacy campaign (Award 2 marks for a title related to water scarcity advocacy 2x1=2 marks) | 2 | ||
| Formulated a goal aligned with the advocacy title (Award 2 marks for a clear and relevant goal 2x1=2 marks) | 2 | ||
| Formulated at least three specific objectives to achieve the goal (Award 2 marks for each relevant objective 3x2=6 marks) | 6 | ||
| Identified primary and secondary target audiences accurately (Award 2 marks for primary stakeholders and 2 marks for secondary stakeholders 2x2=4 marks) | 4 | ||
| Formulated at least two key advocacy messages and strategies for delivery (Award 2 marks for each relevant message/strategy 2x2=4 marks) | 4 | ||
| Identified and built up support including financial and human resources (Award 2 marks for financial and 2 marks for human resource identification 2x2=4 marks) | 4 | ||
| Stated a clear action plan including campaigning, lobbying, media, or education (Award 6 marks for a detailed and feasible action plan) | 6 | ||
| Developed a monitoring framework with appropriate methods, tools, and indicators (Award 6 marks for a complete and relevant monitoring framework) | 6 | ||
| Developed an evaluation framework with suitable methods, tools, and indicators (Award 6 marks for a comprehensive evaluation framework) | 6 | ||
| Presented all sections systematically and logically (Award 7 marks for clear, logical, and systematic presentation of all sections) | 7 | ||
| Sub-Total | 47 | ||
| PRODUCT CHECKLIST | |||
| Completeness and relevance of the advocacy analysis report including title, goals, objectives, target audiences, messages, support, action plan, monitoring and evaluation (Award up to 7 marks for a complete, well-organized, and relevant final report) | 7 | ||
| Sub-Total | 7 | ||
| GRAND TOTAL | 54 | ||
Type: Individual
| Tools & Equipment | Materials |
|---|---|
| Ballpoint pen | Case study document on maternal health challenges |
| Markers set | Advocacy theories reference booklet |
| Writing paper A4 | |
| Flip chart paper A2 |
| S/N | Item | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Case study document on maternal health challenges | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 2 | Advocacy theories reference booklet | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 3 | Writing paper A4 | 5 Sheets per Candidate |
| 4 | Ballpoint pen | 2 Pcs per Candidate |
| 5 | Flip chart paper A2 | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 6 | Markers set (black, red, blue) | 1 Set per Candidate |
| Items to be Evaluated | Marks Available | Marks Obtained | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| TASK 1: Application of Advocacy Theories to Case Study | |||
| Selected a relevant advocacy campaign title based on the case study (Award 2 marks for a title related to the maternal health advocacy campaign) | 2 | ||
| Formulated a clear goal aligned with the campaign title (Award 2 marks for a well-defined goal related to maternal health) | 2 | ||
| Formulated at least three measurable objectives to achieve the goal (Award 2 marks for each objective correctly formulated and related to the goal, max 6 marks) | 6 | ||
| Identified primary and secondary target audiences relevant to the campaign (Award 2 marks for primary stakeholders and 2 marks for secondary stakeholders clearly identified) | 4 | ||
| Formulated at least two key advocacy messages and specified delivery strategies (Award 2 marks for each key message with appropriate delivery strategy, max 4 marks) | 4 | ||
| Identified financial and human resources needed to support the campaign (Award 2 marks for financial resources and 2 marks for human resources identified) | 4 | ||
| Outlined a detailed action plan including campaigning, lobbying, media, education (Award 1 mark for each action plan component correctly described, max 6 marks) | 6 | ||
| Developed a monitoring framework with methods, tools, and indicators (Award 2 marks each for methods, tools, and indicators clearly described) | 6 | ||
| Developed an evaluation framework including methods, tools, and indicators (Award 2 marks each for methods, tools, and indicators clearly described) | 6 | ||
| Presented the advocacy plan sections systematically and logically (Award up to 7 marks for coherent and systematic presentation of title, goals, objectives, target audience, messages, resources, monitoring and evaluation) | 7 | ||
| Drew a flow diagram showing the advocacy process logically (Award 3 marks for a clear, logical advocacy process flow diagram) | 3 | ||
| Sub-Total | 50 | ||
| PRODUCT CHECKLIST | |||
| Advocacy campaign plan document contains all required components with accurate measurements in line with drawing specifications (e.g. clear dimensions of goals, objectives, and framework sections) (Award 10 marks for completeness, clarity, and correct detailing of all components matching the drawing specification dimensions) | 10 | ||
| Sub-Total | 10 | ||
| GRAND TOTAL | 60 | ||
At the start of this chapter we promised you would be able to:
Tick each one you can genuinely do.
So, are you there yet?
You're competent when you can confidently do 50% or more of what this chapter promised.
Sign in to record how you're doing.